Science Based Targets initiative
1.5°C-aligned decarbonisation pathway validation for corporate targets
Launched
2015
Governed by
Partnership: CDP, UNGC, WRI, WWF, and We Mean Business Coalition
Audience
Companies setting and validating science-aligned climate targets; investors monitoring net-zero commitments
Mandatory
Voluntary
Report Format
Validated targets submitted to SBTi; commitment and progress publicly disclosed on SBTi website
Update Cycle
SBTi Corporate Standard updated 2023; Net-Zero Standard published 2021; Sector Pathways updated periodically
Voluntary; increasingly required by investors, procurement programmes, and B Corp certification
Overview
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) provides companies with a clearly defined pathway to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C goal. SBTi validates that a company's emissions reduction targets are 'science-based' — meaning they align with the GHG reductions required to limit global warming to 1.5°C. Over 7,000 companies have committed to SBTi, and more than 4,000 have had targets validated.
Why It Matters for ESG Analysis
SBTi validation is the gold standard for distinguishing credible climate commitments from marketing claims. A company with SBTi-validated targets has demonstrated to an independent third party that its decarbonisation pathway is consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Without SBTi or equivalent validation, any net-zero or climate target claim is effectively unverified.
Key Requirements
Net-Zero commitment letter
requiredFormal commitment to set science-based targets; 24 months to have targets validated
Near-term targets (5–10 years)
requiredEmissions reduction targets for Scopes 1 and 2 by 2030; Scope 3 if >40% of total footprint
Long-term targets (2050)
requiredNet-zero by 2050 or sooner across all Scopes, with ≥90% absolute reduction
Residual emissions neutralisation
requiredRemaining ≤10% of emissions neutralised through permanent carbon removal (not offset credits)
Annual progress reporting
requiredAnnual disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions against validated targets
What 'science-based' means
A science-based target is one that aligns with the level of decarbonisation required to meet Paris Agreement temperature goals. SBTi uses the Sectoral Decarbonisation Approach (SDA) and the Absolute Contraction Approach (ACA) to determine the required emission reduction rate for each sector and apply it to individual companies. The key distinction from a non-validated target is that science-based targets specify the rate of reduction (not just a direction) and are independently checked for methodology and ambition.
SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard
SBTi's Net-Zero Standard (2021) defines corporate net-zero as: a 90–95% absolute reduction in Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 2050 at the latest, with the residual 5–10% neutralised via permanent carbon removal (not offsets). This definition is significantly more demanding than most corporate 'net-zero' claims, which often involve large volumes of low-quality offset credits covering emissions that have not been reduced.
- Scope 1 and 2: 90%+ absolute reduction by 2050 at latest
- Scope 3: 90%+ absolute reduction across full value chain
- Residual emissions: Only permanent removal (not offset credits) counts
- Near-term milestone: ≥50% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 by 2030 is typical requirement
SBTi flag and the offset controversy
In 2024, SBTi published a policy clarification allowing voluntary use of environmental attribute certificates for Scope 3 emission reductions — a controversial move that many climate scientists interpreted as weakening the rigour of the standard. The policy was later partially revised. Investors should check whether a company's SBTi-validated target relies primarily on offsets for Scope 3 reduction or on genuine supply chain decarbonisation.
Common Misconceptions
An SBTi commitment is not the same as SBTi validation — companies have 24 months after committing to get their targets validated. Check the SBTi website for validation status.
SBTi validation does not mean a company has achieved anything — it means its target is credibly set. Progress towards the target is disclosed annually and varies widely.
Net-zero by 2050 without SBTi validation is unverified — any company can self-declare net-zero targets without independent review.
How OpenESG Scores SBTi
OpenESG checks SBTi commitment and validation status for all companies in our universe against the live SBTi database. We flag companies that have committed but not yet validated, and we distinguish between near-term and long-term target status in our environmental score.
Related Frameworks
TCFD
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
The four-pillar framework for climate risk disclosure — now superseded by ISSB
Learn moreISSB
International Sustainability Standards Board
The global investor-focused baseline — IFRS S1 and S2 for capital markets
Learn moreCDP
Carbon Disclosure Project
Investor-grade climate, forests, and water questionnaires — A-List to D
Learn more